Paid to rank
Listings
Visitors
Live, and recalculated from the payment ledger — never from a counter. The full breakdown is on the stats page.
Every other leaderboard asks you to campaign — collect votes, chase upvotes, win over a jury, wait in a queue. This one asks one question: what is being seen worth to you? You pay an amount, and you sit above everyone who paid less. That is the entire mechanism, and it is public, so anyone can check it.
Attention is already bought and sold everywhere on the internet; the usual arrangement just hides the price behind an ad auction nobody can see. Here the price is printed on every row. If you think #1 is overpriced, you can see exactly what it costs and decide not to pay it.
The rules are deliberately asymmetric. Defending a rank costs only the difference; taking someone else’s costs ₹500 above the leader, or ₹10 above any other rank. Incumbents are cheap to defend and expensive to displace, which is what keeps a leaderboard interesting rather than merely expensive.
Being #1 overall is expensive by design. Being #1 in a category, or #1 on today’s board, frequently is not — often a few hundred rupees. Today resets at midnight IST and freezes into a permanent archive, so a good day stays on the record.
Nothing here yet — and nothing invented to fill the space.
Once people have ranked and measured what it did for them, their numbers go here, in their words, with their names on them. If you’ve ranked and have results worth sharing, tell us.
It is an advertising placement, not a contest and not a game of chance. There is no prize and no draw. You are buying a listing at the rank your amount supports, under rules published in full on the rules page and applied identically to everyone. Payments are final — the refund policy says exactly what that means.